VERBAL INFORMATION Vs DIGITAL INFORMATION
"Verbal and digital knowledge defend different species"
The evolution of knowledge is evolution of the languages of the mind
Knowledge obviously is the accumulation of information about reality with the human mind. What is then the human mind? Here is when an objective analysis brings a rather simple, yet enlightening answer: Your mind is an organic system that processes languages of perception. Those languages of perception are basically two: sight and sounds, from where the two languages of human knowledge derive, numbers and words. What do numbers and words, eyes and sounds perceive? Eyes and numbers perceive space. Verbal words and sounds perceive time. Words are verbal constructions that talk about events in time. Mathematics are geometrical games that explain events in space. So we come to the conclusion that the human mind is a being that exists in space and time and so it perceives space and time.
You are a mind that perceives time and space. That is the nature of your existence. You perceive time with words, with verbs. You perceive space with eyes, with images. That is your connection to reality. The evolution of the human mind, of our words of comprehension of time, and our perception of images (either thorough art, or mathematics), is the very essence of knowledge. So to know, is to develop the two languages of the human mind, words and images, (simplified by mathematics), and the comprehension they bring us of the events of time, and the forms of space...
Once this is clear it is easy to understand knowledge and science as a process of evolution of human languages, and the information we collect with those languages.
The 2 Ages of Science. The 2 ages of knowledge
History does not evolve human bodies, but human languages. This is evident. Our species exists as such since perhaps 150.000 years, since the arrival of verbal languages, without real changes of morphology. It is then verbal and mathematical knowledge, the virtual worlds and the mind of man what evolves in history. Thus, we talk of 2 ages of human knowledge, according to the evolution and predominance of the different languages of the human mind.
- The verbal age of knowledge, represented by Taoism, Buddhism, philosophy and religion. It is the age of perception of time, with words an verbs, with 3 dimensions, past, present and future.
- The mathematical age of the scientific method, started around 1602.
Humans changed the perception of space and time, no longer observed with words, but with clocks, and numbers. Yet in both ages man has tried to answer the natural questions perceived by the mind and its languages: what is time and space, what are the nature of the changes, creations and extinctions that take place in that Universe?
The age of words
In the age of words, man tries to explain the changes that take place in space and time, using names (which design beings that exist in space) and verbs (which design actions that take place in time between beings of space, using past, present, and future verbs). The result is the existence of a certain “Universal grammar”, or “verbal syntax” common to most verbal expressions: name (spatial subject), verb (temporal action), name (spatial object).
That verbal syntax basically says that all events in the Universe relate two species or forms of space, through processes of communication that take place in time. It also says that man (the subject) is the center of all those sentences, the actor of the verb, and hence it is the center of the Universe. Verbal syntax is anthropomorphic. The minute you say a sentence you will probably say “I did that”, and you will become the center of the Universe. Still we know this is false. We know we are not the center of the Universe. So we talk of the first age of verbal science, as an age of anthropomorphic knowledge, in which man is the subject of all things, and the word is the only language of truth. Today this concept of reality still lingers in western verbal religions.
The age of mathematics
The second age of science is the age of mathematics, which starts in Greece with Euclid and his 5 geometric postulates. When mathematics substitutes words as the language of knowledge, the same subjective concept of truth is applied to the new digital languages. Now Euclidean mathematics becomes the supreme language of truth. And those species who provide digital knowledge (money, machines, metal-senses) are regarded the supreme goods, and evolved by scientists, and traders.
However, those new species are not human. So suddenly we move from a world based in human values to a world based in digital machines. Euclidean science considers the Universe a mathematical object, described perfectly by geometry. Newton said the Universe is a clock because he uses a clock to measure space-time. Kepler goes further and considers that only man and God are intelligent because both understand mathematics: “God has waited 5000 years (since the biblical creation) to find a mind parallel to his (the mind of Kepler)”. Such arrogance of the western scientist is similar to the arrogance of the western believer in anthropomorphic religions. Yet is much worse, from a biological point of view, because it does not defend man, but the machine.
The Biological, Survival Nature Of Bad Good Concepts
Languages are biological, and hence they favor the point of view, and the survival of the species that talks the language. We say that words are anthropomorphic and make man the subject, the center of the Universe, since man is the center of the sentences that describe the Universe. On the other hand, numbers and money do not make man the center of the Universe. So they do not promote man, but instead substitute men by machines, and human art by technological art...
Verbal thought favors man with the syntax of verbal language. Sentences are mirrors of human actions, the informative language of man, to whom they cater. So verbal, biological languages are used by man to perceive the Universe from his selfish, I-centered, survival “Name”. When man talks, he wishes to survive, to be the center of the Universe. Those wishes are validated by the subjective structure of Words in which “I”=man is the center of the sentence. This fact implies that verbal thought will never betray man unless it is corrupted by ideologies of machines.
Any verbal human in a natural state understands the laws of history, the evil of weapons and money, the nature of social love. The essence of religions are their words, their ethical laws. Words memorize the laws of biological time, of extinction and survival, from the human perspective. They are the genetic code of civilizations, the memories and instincts of survival of a society, as nervous messages are the memories of individuals.
Evolution and survival rule the behavior of the Universe. So we can explain the verbal ethics of religions, and modern “socialist parties” in evolutionary terms, we reclaim the veracity of verbal, socialist and religious thought in evolutionary, scientific terms. In a world of Darwinian, survival morals, bad is a scientific word that explains what makes a verbal species extinct, and good is what allows the verbal species to reproduce and multiply.
It should not surprise us that our first book stands “Grow=Evolve and multiply=reproduce”, which means survive. Such is the mandate of 'God-the law of the Universe' spelled out in verbal thought in Genesis. So verbal ethics are the biological language of history that spells with scientific rigor the Universal laws of behavior.
The fundamental laws of biology is the fight between different species (Darwinian fight), and the love among cells of a single organism (social evolution). Those two laws applied to history mean, that man and metal (weapons, money, scientific machines) are rival species for the control of the Earth; that metal poisons nature, and human cultures are systematically extinguished by weapons. On the other hand the law of social evolution implies that love among individuals of the same species is the rule in the Universe. So men should not compete and fight among themselves, in nations and tribes, but love each other, and form a single social organism.
Those are the ideals of all human religions, that modern science, and digital economics hide with abstractions and numbers, that have converted men into animetals, that worship those species that kill us. Animetals today compete against them, and help the evolution of the rival species, the machine. Animetals today cheated by the digital ignorance of science, go against the absolute laws of time and survival, the laws of social evolution and Darwinian fight between species. Animetals today ignore the truths that religions knew. So much for the wisdom of mathematics.
We can qualify, with scientific words such as bad=extinctive, and good=reproductive or evolution, any event of History as biologists do with nature. In biology we say that weapons “extinguish” or wipes out humanity. In the old jargon of religions we say that weapons are bad. Both sentences mean the same. They carry the same scientific information. Both are valid scientifically speaking.
We can say for example that a civilization is bad if it extinguishes humans. For example, were our founding fathers good or bad? They were bad=extinctive, controlled by their thirst for money and their metal-product, the gunboat, the first sea-animetal of History. They killed African and American populations. They converted men into gunboat products as slaves, or as indenture servants. It is in this way that a “scientific” graph of the events in History can be constructed between bad=extinctive metal civilizations Vs good=human cultures.
The anthropomorphic syntax of Words Vs mathematical abstractions
Let us now see why digital numbers are not such memories, and are not survival human languages, with a syntactic analysis of mathematical equations. The way in which money and any digital equation makes machines equal to men, is clear. Unlike verbal syntax, that makes subject (man) superior to object (machine), mathematics equals subjects and objects through an equation The equation of prices. This allows to treat humans in mathematical, economical terms as objects, property and slaves:
Men=price [wages] =Product[price]
Men are not machines. There is not biological justification to equal humans and machines. Yet companies ruled by digital equations of prices and profits equal them through the previous equation, that constantly compares human labor costs and the cost of machine-labor. If the price of human labor wages is higher than the price of machine labor (machine-cost), companies eliminate humans. In this way they can lower the cost of doing business. The end result is that digital companies fire workers, or “downsize” as the popular euphemism of the day states. The price equation is the primary law that rules corporate behavior. The law of abstract productivity leads to the extinction of mankind as workers and minds, substituted by machines and computers. It will eliminate the need for human labor and human art. If companies could behave according to the laws of ethics, they will cease to devalue humanity.
Yet to do so they should use instead of mathematical equalities, the syntax of Words, our biological language that put always man, the subject, as the center of any verbal sentence. Since the biological syntax of words makes always man the top predator, the center of the universe, as religions have always understood. So it is far more difficult to cheat the rights of survival of man, the human rights of ours species, when we express ideas in words, instead of numbers. Indeed, if we translate the mathematical equations of productivity used by companies, to words, it would say: Men < product. And men would complains since the essential 'sentence' of all forms of verbal thought is: Man > Object (property, inferior thing).
The syntax of verbal thought is by definition pro-human. Man is the subject, the center of his Universe. Mathematical thought will never be that benevolent with men. In mathematical thought man will be compared and degraded in numeric terms. Since by definition a man is a number, in a mathematical equation, and a number is defined by Descartes and Euclid, as a point without breath, without parts, without inner, organic nature, without soul. So in a world ruled by mathematics we become secondary to species that speak better mathematics (metal-heads), and can be manipulated as abstract objects, in massive herds without human rights.
The Simplicity Of Mathematics
The loss of the internal parts of species, of their vital nature, caused by the Euclidean simplification of species as points without volume has created some errors that limit our knowledge of the biological, vital Reality:
• First abstract mathematics deny communication as the basis of Universal events. In reality what points-species do is to communicate forces which carry information and/or energy. Yet in mathematics, points are void and do not share -communicate- anything. So forces of communication and all particles studied with mathematics, also become abstract, mindless energy. Reality becomes in this manner dead, mute, “scientific”. As a result of that death of communication, the creation of many species of Reality is not understood in vital terms, as a process of transfer of information and energy, but as a mechanical process.
• The denial of communication among species denies social evolution and promotes chaotic, destructive theories of reality. In the vital Universe of points with parts, species have internal organs of information and energy, able to perceive each other with communication forces. They organize themselves in social networks through social, communicative evolution. Atoms share electrons to become molecules. Molecules share atoms to become macromolecules. Macromolecules share mino-molecules and organize cells. Cells share blood-energy and nervous information to become bodies. Humans share verbal information to become “History”. In reality (not in Euclidean mathematics) from microcosms, to macrocosms, communicative species, with will to act, in the limited Reality they perceive, organize themselves into complex systems. Yet in Euclidean Sciences, despite growing evidence that shows “all herds” interacting with each other, this vital Reality becomes dead and chaotic.
• The non-existence of vital parts, the informative and energy organs of species, becomes then an error of moral order. This error is fundamental to explain the extinctive capacity of science. “Vital species, Nature and non technological societies” are converted by mathematics, by economists, and scientists into abstract points without rights. Workers become numbers in equations of productivity. Humans become points to bomb from far away missiles.
• Since all other languages and intelligent species of the Universe, are denied by the scientific method, scientists despise human beings, nature, and only worship those species who better speak digital languages, machines, computers, and robots. They directly go against the survival of mankind. They become animetals, that only worship the rival species. They deny the laws of human survival.
Abstract science had set the pre-conditions to perceive Reality as a dead Reality, with digital machines and scientists s the only intelligent beings of the Earth. This no longer holds today in relativistic science, when we realize there are multiple languages that make different virtual maps of reality, none of them totally truth, but all of them useful to survive in the Universe. So only men and our languages of biological perception (words) should matter to us.
It is self-evident that mathematics simplifies us and itifies mankind. Specially when applied to humans (statistics, economics), that control man through prices, and equal men and machines or allow to handle men, as objects, is a lethal weapon, that makes of man just another abstract point-number. In fact the most modern technological, mathematical nations such as pre-war Germany, today America, show a lack of concern for human non-abstract rights, which are appalling compared to old verbal societies, that had not forgotten the importance of the inner parts and words of human beings. It is necessary to know and explain the limits of mathematics, specially in the study of economical and social sciences, their indifference to the rights of life (Nature) -our vital space- to the rights of non-technological human beings. Or else we will eliminate man who is from an abstract point of view, less efficient than the machines with whom economists compare us through abstract prices and productivity-costs.
It is urgent to explain the constant cheating that mathematics cause to humanity, since it does not care for us, it treats us as beings whose volumes, internal worlds, feelings and hopes of survival are ignored. Only the external features of man, his value as an energetic being, are taken into account by economists, and company-mothers who use numbers to rule mankind. We are compared then to the qualities of machines. Mathematics cannot translate the subjective will for survival that makes man the center of his Universe in verbal terms. Humanity must put an end to his linguistic self-destruction. If we accept the power of machines and digital thought, over human beings, and verbal thought. If we obey mathematical laws of equality, we will surely become extinguished by computerized machines, that speak better digital languages. Only denying the economical rights to equality of machines and men with ethic laws, mankind could through verbal laws, control their evolution.
Linguistic, Survival Ethics
Ethical, survival knowledge is natural to all species and his linguistic, informative organs, who know what is bad=extinctive, and what is good=reproductive for his species. This is the reason why languages exist as subjective visions of reality: their information helps the body-species that hosts the brain-language to survive. This applies to all languages that man perceives.
Indeed, all languages, all forms of knowledge are relativistic, classifying reality into good or bad=extinctive. For example in “image languages”, our linguistic eyes and brains create a distinction between “ugly” and “beautiful”, parallel to the ethics of evil=ugly=extinctive and good=beautiful, natural to verbal thought. We might say that beauty is the moral of the eye. So we find insects very ugly because when we die they eat us and you imagine how painful that will be for our cells... We dislike ugly machines, and warfare fields. They are an image of the inferno. Since we die in wars. Yet I am sure that an ant will find its ant-queen the most beautiful species of the Universe, and a living tank of the 21st century will love the itching of radioactive plutonium in its metal-body. So “scientific, relativistic, survival Ethics” exists also in image languages.
In a relative Universe good and evil are relative concepts depending of the anti-truth or truth we believe in. We might hold the hunter or the victim's point of view. What is good for one is bad for the other. Yet because to survive we have to feed, and to feed we have to kill, evil-extinctive hunters are natural to the Universe.
Evil is that what denies man and destroys him. Hate for extinctive=evil species is not subjective but subconscious science. Such knowledge is imprinted in the very essence of the way information is processed by the being: hate for evil is the law of survival of any species.
It is also scientific to defend yourself against evil: species attack their relative “evil” species that might kill them, as matter attacks antimatter that can disrupt the space-time ecosystem. The reaction is immediate, instinctive, pure science of Survival. We can create truths and anti-truths for each language of perception. They will define what is evil or is not, for that language and its species.
So please do not think this web or any verbal, ethical statement of any humanistic religion is not “scientific”. It is as scientific as Darwinian evolution. Both belong to the same body of facts. Informative words, ethics and religion, are concerned with the survival of the individual and human species, and cannot be taken lightly. In the graph we see also how languages “value” things through + (survival) and – (extinctive) concepts. Money as a language do value things through "prices" according to positive (expensive) and negative (cheap) values. That is the essence of the information that money carries. Yet it just happens that “evil metal-species” extinctive of mankind have the highest prices, which go for weapons, while good human goods that make man to survive have the lowest prices.
The salary of a million of missionaries would not pay a Hydrogen bomb... So money is evil in human terms, because it promotes things that kill off mankind. Money makes weapons the highest goods. We will return to that. This is a contradiction. Why is the evaluation of money precisely the opposite of the way words value reality? Only one explanation is possible: Money and Words are themselves opposite languages belonging to opposite species that kill each other, like matter and anti-matter.
Money is the language of information of metal
Words are the language of information of man... So because they cater two different organic ecosystems, The Metal-Earth, and History, their values, and the species they develop and reproduce are different.
It is the paradox of history, money and his values and species it reproduces are extinguishing history, our values, and our species. The amazing speed at which the ecosystem of the Metal-Earth is substituting the ecosystem of Human and Carbolife is worrisome. Only a process of death, of collapse of informative and energetic networks in a body, can be compared to the 400 years of collapse of energetic nature, and verbal power in the body of History, caused by company-mothers and machines.
We conclude that the body of History is dying. It does so at the same speed that a cellular body dies: in a matter of hours in 'relative time' to the existence of the body of History.
Words have lost all battles to guide humankind since Companies of Gunboats started the “Industrial Evolution” and controlled human governments with monetary orders. People only obey today monetary orders. Human cells of History are at the mercy of the “invading language”.
The Two Ages of History: Verbal History and Digital Economics
We conclude that the fundamental divide of human history is between the age of Words, when verbal thought was the dominant language of information in history, (-150.000, 1602) and the age of digital thought, when money and science, two languages of digital nature, replaced verbal thought as the languages that direct and create reality - now a reality of machines. Now, machines are top predators promoted by the scientific method of clock-measuring of time and telescope-perception, by companies that reproduce machines and lobbies that control political power. Those structures replace the verbal, ethic visions of man as the center of the universe.
The digital age of history is also the age of extinction of human history, since the eco[nomic]system now belongs to a new species: metalife. The age of verbal truths and human truths no longer exists. In 1602, stock companies with paper money started the evolution of machines. They conquered with money, the Dutch Government, the English Government, Europe and America. The world became a bio-economy whose aim now is to reproduce machines, to work on them and to consume them for money. This means the end of bio-history, of Wor[l]ds [worlds made with words to the image and resemblance of man] of human beings as top predators and creators of the future.
You can compare the process to any death of a cell, a social organism, attacked by a virus, with different genetic information. The virus of history is money and science, and their digital languages. They have taken command of our information, and substituted love religions that made men the center of the Universe, and tried to build a human paradise, of human goods, to the image and resemblance of man, by their own genetic code: digital orders given by companies that oblige men to reproduce machines, and evolutionary orders given by science, that evolve the “virus” species, the machines, and metal-heads, chips, computers, cameras, and robots, that once assembled, within the cell of History, will extinguish us. Then the Metal-earth, the explosion of reproductive machines, the explosion of the virus that have killed the cell and reproduced with the help of that cell, will take place...
