Wealth, inflation and welfare. How to read them.

      If we could explain in a single sentence the fundamental thesis of Military Lobbyism respect to economical wealth, we should use a sentence that became famous in the 20s, during the last wave of fascism: "Cannons instead of butter". Military Lobbyism chooses cannons, lethal goods, instead of human goods, because they create more profits. Military Lobbyism knows that cannons are more expensive than butter. And so the sale of cannons give higher profits. As our civilization becomes corrupted by the third age of the Industrial cycle of Metal-heads, and speculation creates bigger profits in the stock-market, as laws become corrupted by Military Lobbyism, that monstrous solution to the economical crisis which seems rationally absurd (since a dead person either in war or Holocaust cannot spend their wealth at all), becomes in the 'heated' ambient of profits, in the spiral of speculation, not only possible but 'realist'. The "real-politicks' of neofascist leaders come then to the conclusion that to make cannons and enjoy profits as long as they last, is better than to make butter for the poor, and have only a condo in New York instead of the entire skyscraper.
      Of course again we find that the end of it all is a war in which human wealth is destroyed as metal wealth, machine wealth grows. Who should we blame of that state of affairs. In first place our economists because they are the people who determine the laws of wealth, the price of things, the productive equations of company-mothers, and ultimately the way in which the GNP of nations is measured, and hence the economic indicators that mislead politicians, into increasing the lethal wealth of nations in weapons, and technological gadgets, in cannons, instead of butter.
      Only a reform of those economical indicators to measure the true wealth of nations, implemented by 'ethonomists', economists who make of man not of machine the goal of productive welfare, could change that tendency, and allow politicians to change their present trend towards neofascism, and war, pushed by the public desire of 'growing economical wealth'...
      To do so, economists should convert their discipline from a dogmatic religion in favor of machines, to a science that studies as all sciences do, the value of their goods, from a real frame of reference, with negative and positive values...
      In Bio-economics it is fundamental to understand the concept of negative price value. In Abstract Economics, weapons and digital machines add to the GNP. In a real bio-economical system, that maximizes human survival and human welfare, lethal products have negative values, since they go against the evolution of mankind. So they do not add but subtract to the GNP of a nation.
      Perhaps some theoretical background on the nature of scientific coordinates, is required to understand the Bio-economical coordinates of values.
      Since knowledge is subjective to the frame of reference that perceives reality [Principle of Relativity of Einstein], when describing any Universal system of knowledge, we need to create first a linguistic frame of reference, or coordinates with negative and positive parameters, that describe in terms of our "linguistic values," the Ecosystem.
      In physics we do use mathematical coordinates, with positive (+) or negative (-) values which are referred to the space-time position of the observer.
      For example if we measure speed, negative acceleration rests in the negative side of the frame of reference and positive acceleration adds. It follows that in Biological economics we need also negative and positive prices referred to the biological effects of products in the observer [the Human species]. So Human[goods] will have positive value; and lethal goods negative values. What extinguishes or degrades human minds, or human bodies, is negative; what promotes human life, evolution, and perception through human senses is positive. Such products should be promoted by politicians and economists. The lethal products should be limited. The easiest bio-economical frame of reference is built on the 3 biological drives that all living beings follow when they want to survive and evolve. All species want to improve their natural body-energy, their natural mind-information, and their natural reproduction, in order to improve themselves and survive. So goods that improve our natural information [art, verbal information: "I think therefore I am"]; our natural energy [food, housing, transport means], and our reproductive and social skills [love, health, social freedom and sex] are 'positive goods'. And those who curtail such natural drives of any living being are negative:

      In the graph, the 3 biological goals of mankind, human social reproduction, human energy, and human information, are fostered by certain goods. If we give to each good a certain value in those 3 organic goals, we can put them within the frame of reference.
      Positive Y values are given to goods that foster human mental-informative evolution. Negative Y values are given to goods that diminish human mental evolution.
      Positive X values are given to goods that foster human body evolution.
      Negative X values are given to goods that foster human body devolution.
      And finally in the positive Z coordinates we consider goods that foster human social communication and reproduction.
      And in negative Z coordinates we consider goods that diminish human social communication.
      Because we know the biological nature of man, it is very easy to put in one of such graphs all kind of goods, and classify them as negative goods with negative GNP value, that laws and credit should discourage, or positive goods that should be promoted.
      The vectorial sum of the entire frame of reference will give the total value of national GNPs.
       It should not surprise us that a calculus of such real GNP, puts America well down in a national list while countries such as Canada, Australia, Scandinavia or Southern Europe advance to top positions. Is such bio-economical vision shared by most people? Indeed; let us consider a simple prove: South Europe is a small region hardly promoted by world-wide networks of information. Yet it receives 3 times more tourists than the entire American nation. It seems people prefer to share the healthy way of life of those countries - for example, a social get-together of friends, at a home-made restaurant on a street terrace, or a beach, that the growing American reality - a likely shot on a Hamburger joint, or some delivery food, in front of a TV set, for fear to move freely in the outside world. But that could be changed if the people of America learned some basic truths about the Economic ecosystem in which we all live, and economics becomes a real science.
      Up until now there is no serious economic alternative to right-wing economics. It is surprising in that sense, the lack of evolution in left-wing economics, compared to the constant renewal of right-wing economics, that knows how to dress-up their industrial objectives in new human-like clothes which the common man fancies.
      The rational voter from the left, feels defeated in this landscape. He does not want the failed theories of Marxism. He does not want to vote for parties that pretend to defend the citizen against economic abuse, and then become instruments of companies, in Mr. Clinton's style. Neither do they want - as selfish human beings - to make the defense of the Animal Kingdom the focus of politics as ecologism does.
      As a consequence, the proposals of left-wing parties, fail in elections. And the technological dreams of Lobbyism become elected. If we add the fact that mass-media companies control most of the information that reaches our citizens, and only filter on fundamental themes such as science and economics, positive news, that favor company ideals, it becomes obvious that a wall of misinformation affects our societies, and covers up the real nature of the world in which we live, with abstractions of little scientific fundament.
      The citizen then believes that progress is technology, and sacrifices some basic rights to company-mothers with the fantasy that they will bring through its products a better world.
      In this manner he finally votes those who will destroy him with the mirage wealth of negative products such as Weapons and lethal machines.
     And the hopes of a human world, of a paradise of real human wealth fail against the Technological messianism of companies which control right-wing politicians, and are making the world a great "company-mother" of machines. A world where human freedoms become increasingly reduced to those tasks in which the humankind helps the main purpose of companies, which is the reproduction of machines and its evolution and testing by consumers. Yet humans are not only consumers or workers=reproducers of machines. They have other needs, and rights, that have to be defended, and require other goods that have to be produced.


      A real science of eco[nomic]systems.

      Such a world in which the rights of company-mothers are superior to the rights of human beings, is presented as a 'better world' under false economic postulates and scientific myths that confuse the evolution of mankind and the evolution of machines.
      What are those false postulates [truths without proof] religiously accepted by Economic Universities, and political institutions?
      The fundamental thesis that right-wing economics defends is what we might call the Smith Postulate: "The wealth of nations is the quantity of money and machines a nation has." Once this postulate is religiously accepted, since men want to be wealthy, it follows that our objective in life must be to reproduce and consume more machines and more money.
      Thereafter all politicians and economists, indoctrinated by the Smith Postulate, will try to increase the National Product of a nation, measured as the money and machines the nation has.
      However the Smith Postulate does not define the wealth of nations. It is a false postulate, a dogma, developed by members of the Calvinist culture that made of go[l]d, god, [Calvin said, "The intelligence of God is money"].
      In that sense it is necessary to evolve Economics, into a real science, based on real, logic postulates, as other sciences have done, not on beliefs without prove. Or else humans will be ruled by a primitive, inaccurate "Ptolomeic system' of dogmas of little use to control to our advantage the world in which we live.
      What are the real facts, about the relationship between wealth, money and machines, 'the religious postulate' of economics covers up?
      The historic fact that the time when a nation has more money and machines is during periods of war. Then the quantity of human goods, basic for our survival, such as food, housing, life and freedom are minimal.
      So if money and machines are not the essential wealth of nations, how should we define wealth in human terms?
      This is the question that left-wing parties should ask, and answer scientifically, to face the rather obsolete economic discourse of the right-wing, still holding onto those religious postulates of Mr. Smith.
      In fact left-wing parties do know and put into practice the right answer to such a question, even if they do not have the theoretical background that explains their correct goals.
      We want to provide them with one such theoretical background.
      In the world of economics we have to differentiate the products reproduced by companies and individuals into two clear groups:
      - Human goods which are goods that men require to survive, and better themselves.
      - And certain Metal goods [machines] such as weapons, which harm human beings.
      The wealth of a nation should be defined as the wealth in Human Goods, that most citizens require and enjoy, because they improve their lives: Agriculture, housing, health, education, free time, peace, freedom, textiles, a clean environment, books, art, public transport, etc. These goods have several advantages for societies: They are clean, do not contaminate, and they are essential for our survival. They are the natural, biological goods, that a society should credit and reproduce. Besides they require a lot of human work, because many of them cannot be reproduced by machines alone. Such is the case of art, housing, agriculture, health and education, that need human labor and create employment.
      Yet those goods are the goods promoted by all left-wing parties, which should be given for that reason, the generic name of 'Human parties': parties that promote human goods.
      On the other hand the poverty of nations is its wealth in those goods which destroy mankind, such as weapons, which destroy our bodies, or robots, which destroy jobs, or 'mental machines' such as TV-networks that hypnotize humans in front of a false virtual world based on violence and movement.
      Such hypnotism 'consumes' between 3 and 6 hours a day of our lives, diminishing our social intercourse, our capacity to learn through readings, and make us violent men, obsessed with consuming and money. Addiction to television could, in such a sense, be compared to addiction to drugs.
      It has been proved that animal eyes, become hypnotized by light and movement even if it harms them, like flies going to the light where predators eat them easily. In that sense television acts on the basic instincts of our perception curtailing our freedom.
      We could also include to a certain extent Internet among such negative goods for our evolution as human beings. Around 25% of Internet time is dedicated to pornography. The anonymous system of internet, and the technique of browsing does not allow sound relationships between citizens either, or a serious education, as a library with analytical books provides.
      Weapons, robots, and 'metal-mind networks' are therefore metallic goods that diminish the health of nations, because they are not human energy, or positive information, that improve the life of people, despite being promoted systematically by right-wing parties. Besides they are goods that require few workers, far less than human goods, since machines are best at reproducing metallic machines. Or, as in the case of robotics and internet, they directly attack human jobs. Robots can potentially substitute all industrial workers. While a worldwide system of internet sales will mean the end of at least 100 million workers worldwide in the sales and shopping sector for the benefit of a few multinationals through computerized sales systems.
      We should therefore talk of right-wing parties, as 'machine-parties' or 'metal-parties' that promote lethal machines and the companies that reproduce them, over human goods, and the human labor that reproduces them.
      And we should oppose the goods and futures that both kinds of parties promote, from the point of view of which goods are healthy to mankind and truly mean the wealth of nations.
      Right-Wing parties promote a world where machines, and metal goods, and the companies that reproduce them have more rights than human beings. They are creating a new ecosystem, 'the Metal-Earth', the eco[nomic]system, in which machines, and its language of information digital money, have higher rights than human beings, and his languages of information, laws and ethic words.
      Such ecosystem is rapidly extinguishing the previous ecosystems, of 'history' [the human ecosystem] and nature [the life ecosystem]
      Left-wing parties promote a world where humans and human goods, and our languages of social information [laws and ethics] and the citizens that believe on them, have more rights than machines. They promote the survival and evolution of history.
      If left wing organizations would adopt this clear-cut, scientific description of the two ecosystems of the Earth, and its dominant species, machines and men, differentiating human goods, and lethal goods, on the basis of the welfare and survival of humans, it would be much easier to understand for the common citizen, why it could be good for them, to promote parties and companies of human goods, in order to increase human employment, diminish the chances of war and death, and truly evolve socially the health and wealth of nations.


      The myth of scarcity: credit 'creates' the goods of our societies.

      ?How a society reproduces our two kinds of goods?
       It does so through credit, that is through the invention of money, which later on is used to give orders to citizens, that will work under salaries, reproducing either one or the other kind of goods. However there are two ways to invent money in our society.
      Money can be invented in the stock-market, through paper-shares, which are a credit given to a company. That company will then use that money to invent and market its product.
       Money also can be invented through governments, and banks, by means of paper-money. Again that money is later on used by the government as a credit to reproduce or promote the products of the welfare state.
      We could talk of two kinds of deficits: deficit of the stock-market, and deficit of the government.
      Technically speaking, both deficits mean the same thing; it is free money, invented to reproduce goods. If either the market or the government invents too much money, there is inflation and money loses value. So there is a limit to the quantity of money governments and stock-markets should be allowed to reproduce, or else, the economy becomes unstable.
       However both kinds of money, are not used in the same way.
      The stock-market, since it appeared in the XVII century in Holland, as an instrument for the reproduction of gunboats, systematically invents money for metallic goods, but it hardly invents a penny for human goods. This happens because 'stockrats', the owners of companies only look for profits, and profits are higher in expensive goods [the most expensive goods are Weapons] and software goods [digital goods very cheap to reproduce].
       On the other hand, the government invents money for welfare goods that give less profit, human goods, needed by humanity, which also create a lot of employment.
      In a free society, citizens, and its representatives, governments, should have the right to decide what goods they want to be credit, and banks, stocks and governments, should allow credit only to companies that reproduce such goods. Then human goods would become abundant and lethal good scarce. In a dictatorship of companies, only companies have the right to invent for free money, with stocks. They forbid governments to invent money [to have credit], with laws against government deficits, and encourage governments to invest whatever money they have in metallic goods such as weapons and telecoms. So governments are obliged to extort taxes from citizens, to further increase the wealth of company-mothers, and cannot create the goods citizens ask them for. They seem inefficient, while the free credit given to companies by stocks, allows truly inefficient enterprises with huge losses such as those of Internet, to waste enormous resources that could be otherwise used for the betterment of our societies.
      We now understand why there is a chronic scarcity of human goods in our democracies, despite the will of our citizens, who prefer human goods. The two languages of power of modern societies, law and money, are controlled by companies(reproducers of machines), through lobbies, and through the stock-market, and the imposition of laws that prevent the government to govern, and promote human goods such as the zero deficit law.


      The dictators of Democracies.

      Moreover, in as much as a democracy means the control of the languages of power by the people, our society is not a democracy because the government elected by the people does not invent money - companies do in the stock-market - and does not follow the mandates of its population when it makes laws (lobbies influence legislators that legislate in favor of companies). Increasingly today companies dictate the laws and the credit of democracies. Laws that basically protect their products and the owners of stocks, the new ari-stockrats of the modern world. Since they have no legal responsibilities as aristocrats did, thanks to the law of Anonymous societies. And they have total control of the language of power as aristocrats did. Today it is money, in the past it was weapons which aristocrats controlled.
      We might say that we are moving towards a new 'ancient regime' where the new aristocrats, the biggest stockrats [0.1% of the population], control the law and the money of our societies. Even parliaments during the Middle Ages had more freedom since they controlled the money the king had. We are entering into an age of anti-democracy, the 'dictatorship of companies', where companies control and dictate, through laws and money, the two languages of social power in human societies, the life and ideas of our citizens.
      Such dictatorship is very advanced in America, where the system of legal lobbyism has grown to the point of suffocating the will of citizens and the obligation of politicians to legislate according to his voters' wishes. Today companies select politicians from the beginning, through campaign money. Once those politicians are elected, companies keep them in check with 'legal bribes', which are offered routinely to those senators that vote laws in favor of companies and their products, not in favor of citizens that elected them.
       In this manner, political parties are becoming mere theatrical masks which hide such dictatorship of democracies. This is why in nations where the dictatorships of companies is stronger such as America, there are so many weapons and 'metal-minds', while citizens lack basic goods such as universal health care and education, or peace and free time, that far less wealthy nations like Spain possess. Americans do not need so many metal-goods, but the credit of the market reproduces them; and televisions brain-wash their minds to consume them. If the left-wing could explain this properly to its citizens, Americans could then differentiate between both kind of societies, and decide what they want in the nearby future: Butter or cannons, human goods or metal goods, good jobs that help people's lives or alienating jobs, and the growing competence of computers and robots reproducing more machines?
      A human, Genesian Paradise, or an Orwellian, Neofascist nightmare as the one we start to see coming from America the nation more advanced in the 'dictatorship of democracies'?

COMPANY-MOTHERS

THE LAWS OF EVOLUTION AND REPRODUCTION OF MACHINES


"Company-mothers only care for the reproduction and evolution of machines"

     Despite what cynics might consider, the natural Human Condition is not as evil as the present human condition. Reason, science and common sense prove it. We are born as children whose maximum pleasure is to love and be loved by our fathers. If you remember your childhood and youth - we all had one - your biggest desire was to be loved by your friends in school, by your parents at home. For you it was important ethics. Ethics mattered. You wanted to be good, and be brave. You wanted to be appreciated by your moral qualities. Children are not the character of the Lord of the Flies, typical product of the Cynic school of British thought, in a civilization totally impregnated by go(l)d values, since Calvin took power of the English and Scottish church. Rousseau not Luther and Calvin was right: man is good by nature, tends to help the others. He tends to love. Biological Science (not to confuse with Abstract Physics) now has come to the rescue of those religious ideals that most people believe - so much that people even today when many no longer believe in the resurrection of Christ, and his creation of the Universe, still want to be Christians to hold that positive morality. Indeed, we know by Theory of Organisms, and Theory of social evolution, that to be good, to help the others, to become part of a social advanced organism in which equal cells share energy and information (as they do in the organism of your body), is more efficient, than to fight individually. It helps yoursurvival. While individual Homo bacteria that fight each other, are primitive, underdeveloped species, that in the animal kingdom were top predators... 1000 million years ago. Then it came Social evolution, and with Religion and the law it also came to Mankind.
      Those are the facts that rule the Universe. Equal beings gather in herds from atoms becoming molecules to stars become galaxies, because in a herd you survive better. Why then mankind after a good start in social evolution with the expansion of ethic religions hundreds of years ago, has regressed to the neo-paleolithic Homo bacteria stage, becoming a beast, in a dog-eat-dog society, who of lately cares not even for his own survival, poisoning his environment, degrading his mind with unending hours in front of television, carrying around concealed or open weapons, mistrusting every other human being?
      The answer is: the company-mother, his languages, his ideologists the economists, his laws, and the equations that guide the behavior of those companies.
      Yet, you might think, if man is good he would have opposed those company mothers. Anti-live=eviL might have infected a few humans but finally man would have rebelled and won the battle against economical evil.
      Maybe, but to do so man should have kept his language, verbal thought, his mean of communication with other humans, in order to create those social organisms in which men love and share energy and information with men, through words of love.
      A species without language is no longer a species, no longer communicates, and without communication social evolution is no longer possible.
      So what really has happened to mankind in order to become a beast of himself, has been the lost of his language of perception, information and communication: verbal thought, and the superior forms of verbal thought: religious and ethic laws and behavior.
      Instead man has been colonized by a new language, mathematics, numbers, abstract concepts that convert real beings into numbers, and then numbers which are meaningless have been converted in products, corpses, slaves of prices and wages, since now men were no longer human beings, but abstract numbers in an equation.
      In this manner evil has become subconscious, handled with statistics and economical equations. In this manner a man who is otherwise noble, friend of his friends, caring with his family, even a member of the community able to work as many Americans or Europeans do in a charitable organizations of all kind, enters everyday at 8 o clock in his company, to do only evil at distance, through computer nets, and numbers, profit equations, productivity equations, share-value equations.
      In this manner evil has been institutionalized by an organism, the company-mother whose aim is to reproduce and evolve machines, and destroy as a collateral effect the rival ecosystem of carbolife and the Carbo-Earth (since there is no space for two species, two networks, and two heads, and two languages in a single planet, one has to rule over the other, and as it rules, and expands, it extinguish the other).
       Of course those billions of men who dedicate half of their awakening life to do evil with mathematical equations in company-mothers and governments controlled by them are hardly aware of their acts. Because they use abstract, meaningless mathematical equations. To further allow them to do so without sorrow or regret - which could slow down the speed of evil, the speed of extinction - a very limited number of people which truly are evil, which truly know what they are doing, have invented a science of evil called Economical theory. Those people were extremely intelligent. Adam Smith, Ricardo, Say, Malthus and other economists all belonging to the Go(l)d religions that worship profits over man, digital prices over verbal ethics, had in common to be extremely skillful in the way they invented the Myths of economics against mankind, and extremely twisted in their relationship with carbolife, with human life, with hearts and feelings, as the mad scientist is. All of them belonged to the Calvinist-Anglican-Jewish religion that represses human senses and converts a human being into a mask of himself, by cutting off the 3 wills of any organic being:
      Human energy (food and pleasure)
      Human information (ethic verbal law).
      Human reproduction (sex and love.)
      To that aim their Go(l)d religions came in handy.
      The Aaronite Go(l)d version of Judaism (against Mosaic commandments) repressed sex to the point of mutilating your pleasure organ [penis], forbidding good food, the most tasty species [pork], and rational verbal information, confused with meaningless rituals and magic chants. In essence it represses all human rights to a balanced development of the human being. While it praises work=reproduction of machines, digital knowledge [kabala, magic numbers, love of science, money as the intelligence of God], and war-machines [since it allows to kill a gentile, not chosen of God]. The same happens with Protestant sects, modern versions of that paradigmatic Aaronite gold religion. Calvinists reinvented the parable of the tree of science and its evil fruits, which became the tree of sex and its evil orgasms. Anglicans repressed feelings, so parents in England never kissed their children. "No sex please we are British". Today the American civilization has translated all those repressive systems to 'scientific and political dogmas' of correctness: Flirting is now Sexual harassment, indifference to good food is called dietetics, work-ethics stay the same, repression of feelings is called "to be cool", etc. Go[l]d religions evolve, their dogmas remain the same.
      In all those cultures, information is worshipped. Yet it is not verbal, but 'digital information' what really a monetary culture desires, to count profits since the age of coins and mathematical, Greek science. So the scientific method is preferred, and verbal ethic religions despised.
      It is in that milieu where the company-mother was born, in Amsterdam, London, and New York... to the glory of the digital machine, and the language of profits.
      Because those men who were in those companies had destroyed their human condition through Go[l]d religions, it came to them natural to destroy the human condition of other human beings and put all their vital energy in creating, evolving, reproducing and taking care of their machines and Go(l)d.
      In this manner they accepted the digital laws of economical evil and promoted them subconsciously or consciously. It did not matter: There were not in their minds any humanity left, only scientific, economical-digital equations. Let us translate them to verbal meanings:

The law of price:
Man =Price = Product = Full Time Slave.

The law of salaries:
Human Time = Price = Salary = Part-time slave.

The law of Wages:
Man = Wage > Cost = Machine=Min. Cost =Max. profit.
Man obsolete. Wages down.

The law of productivity:
Man reproduces X machines. Machine reproduce Y Machines. Y > X.
Man obsolete. Wages down.

The law of speculation:
Min. Workers x Max. Machine-workers = Max. Profit (by the law of wages)
= max. stock-value = Max unemployment

The law of wealth:
Max. Price= Max. Profits =Max. Wealth
Max. Price = Weapons; Max. Weapons = Max. GNP wealth.
Max. War = Max. weapons = Max. GNP wealth x Max. murder.

The law of overproduction:
Max. Reproduction of machines of max. price = Max. profit = Max. weapons
= Max. number of wars = Max. destruction of mankind.

      Those are the verbal, ethic translations of the digital, profit laws that rule company-mothers and the governments they control in a free economic ecosystem. All are laws of eviL=anti-Live.Those are the equations that cause Lobism and war. Those are the equations that extinguish mankind.
      Can we change them? No. We can't, as long as we do not hold Company-mothers by the Law of Anonymous Societies, responsible of their acts against mankind. Can we change the attitude of those who worship those laws? It is embedded in their scientific, Go(l)d culture. So we need to change those cultures and destroy the power of abstract, digital languages have in our societies... To return to a legal world, and a verbal, biological, organic explanation of the Economic system, to acknowledge the errors of science (to which we will dedicate an entire number of this magazine, latter this year), and understand that Go[l]d religions are false, corrupted versions of Love religions, changed by the power of weapons (inquisitions).
      If people could undestand machines and money as metallic organisms of energy and information, not as the invisible hand of god, but the very visible hand of Evil=anti-live organisms, rivals of our CarboEarth ecosystem, they could react to the extinction of mankind. Now they don't even know what destroy us.
      So we need a reaction of our citizens and the politicians they elect, against the total power of company-mothers, reforming the laws that rule those companies, and their stock-markets, along the lines of a new science, Ethonomics, based in economical measures that favor mankind, not machines, as abstract economics and their digital laws do.
      A lot of work that should start with a new race of politicians, scientists, and economists who care for the real God, the Human god, the verbal God, the God of the Carbo-earth paradise, not for the Go(l)ds of the tree of science, of inferno, of the Metal-earth. Now all our politicians, all our company-mothers, all our scientists live erased by digital equations they hardly understand, but slavishly obey. Slaves though cannot expect from existence more than work, injustice and death. But they can choose to be slaves or fight for freedom. Today men have chosen to become slaves of the digital laws of company-mothers. They should know their future is written in those equations:

"Man=price=product"

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY

DANTE'S INFERNO: THE MAD SCIENTIST.


"During the third age of the evolution of machines scientists design top predator Weapons and military Lobbyism uses them in wars of carbolife extinction"

     Recent news:
       "Scientists in Thailand introduce Roboguard, a police robot, connected to internet, able to shoot criminals guided by a laser beam" July 2000. New Scientist.
       "A new chip opens the door to molecular, microscopic computers, million of times faster than present models" August 2000
       "Jordan Pollack and Hold Lipson create a robotic factory able to evolve and reproduce its robotic products" September 2000, Nature.
       "In two years we will be able to create reproductive ants" Jordan PollacK
       "Quantum computing will allow robots of an intelligence far superior to that of human beings" June 2001
       "Robots will be of great help. They will eliminate all tedious jobs from the industry" Hans Moravec, head of Carnegie Mellon's department of Robotics. Scientific American. Large print.
       "Robots will extinguish mankind in a free market. Robotic Companies will divert resources towards robotic reproduction. As a superior species they will eliminate human beings, as North-American mammals did with South-American primitive species" Hans Moravec. Small print book.

     The lethal technologies of the III Industrial R=evolution.

      As the 2000s move in, and the new technologies of the Third Industrial evolution, namely Robotics, expand in all the ecosystems of the economy, expelling workers, and soldiers, from their jobs, we will witness an increasing fear of the population towards scientists. Such vision of physics was indeed the prevailing vision of the 20s and 30s, when at the end of the cycle of Metal-bodies, people realized that science was really technology, and the best technological machines are weapons. Science indeed was closer to the Original Sin, than the paradise. In the 20s the concept of the mad scientist will again dominate the public view... and the propaganda in favor of scientific machines will dominate our corrupted networks of information, trying to pass as 'pets', 'friends', 'workers that facilitate our tasks', those robots that will extinguish mankind.
      For the cultured man, the cynicism, arrogance, dogmatism and ignorance of abstract science is beyond doubt. Yet Physics and chips have huge backers, namely the company-mothers that make machines, the military that use weapons, the financial companies that use their computers. So very likely science would prevail and extinguish mankind.
      Why? Because among all the human-haters that mankind has witnessed in his own race, there is nobody so scornful, ignorant, and evil towards us, as the Physicist.
      Take the case of Mr. Moravec. He perfectly knows and so he explains in a small book that hardly anybody has ever read, the superiority over human beings of his 'sons', the robots, to whom he is teaching to see, and how the evolutionary processes, the laws of the Universe will extinguish us. Yet he makes a fortune selling those vision systems, from his Carnegie Mellon University. So he writes in Scientific American a long article, talking of the goodness of robots, on how they will be our assistants, pets, servants, and workers for difficult and dangerous jobs. The same can be said of Marvin Minsky, the Jewish-American, father of Artificial intelligence, who compares himself to God, in his attempts to create a 'species superior to man'.
      Problem with those physicists is that they know what they are doing. if they did not know you might stop them. But when in the earlier nineties I contacted them, trying to warn them on the Evolutionary laws of Bio-Economics, I found that for many of them it was no news. Specially those working in the weapon industry, manufacturing in places like Sandia Base, terminator-like robots... They know they are in the ninth circle of Hell, which Dante described as the place where those who attack the entire human race will be condemned.
      In the earlier 90s I sent out 200 books on bioeconomics, robotics and the extinction of man to the main departments of robotics in America. I got no single answer. As Bill Joy said in his article on the extinction of man by robotics, supreme evil exist among us. Specially among physicists. It has always been like that. Galilee, a misogynist, a woman-hater, founder of ballistics, made of fortune applying his equations of space-time, to improve the reach of cannonballs. He died very wealthy. Nobel made a fortune manufacturing dynamite to the French-Prussian war. He died very wealthy. Einstein wrote a letter to the president to make the atomic bomb. He put his son on a mad house and forgot to mention him on his memoirs. He said of his wife, a competent scientist also, that as a woman she could only reproduce children, not ideas. Newton had to step out of the honorific position he obtained in the Mint, after improving the fire systems of the Royal Navy, because he insisted in killing anyone who had forged a coin. He died virgin. Those are the great names of science... They hate to reproduce children, to socialize with men, to love women, to profit mankind. They love to reproduce machines, to compare themselves to God. And God, the evolutionary laws of the Universe, will punish us all for their arrogance.
      What people should understand is that the mad physicist, is real. He feels as a chosen of God: Kepler said god had waited 5000 years since the biblical foundation, to find an intelligence like his. Minsky said he makes robots to feel like God, and create a being superior to man. Is he an android or a man?, we might wonder Newton thought comets were God's envoys to his preferred son. Einstein said that if Mercury had not proved his relativity theory, God should be corrected. He does not realize that all his power comes from his machines. His machines are better perceptors of the Universe. They are not. The scientist is basically an artisan of metal, who constructs sensorial machines and energy machines for the military. He basically works to improve those machines, used preferentially to control and kill people. Today, the American scientists, as the German scientists of the 20s, are about to do so, researching in all possible fields of the Robotic industry.
      Our robotists will display the same degree of evil and cynicism that our Atomic scientists displayed in the 50s and 60s. Who is going to stop them? I wonder...
      Of course there is always the false excuse of knowledge. They forgot that an extinct species know nothing. They also forget as we explained in other web, 'The vital Universe', that mostly what physics has done is to convert the vital, bio-logical universe, into an abstract, meaningless mess. We knew less details but we knew better the great meanings of that Universe before abstract, digital science was born. The errors introduced by abstract physics mainly concerned with energy release (weapons) and mathematics, the language of machines, are many. Take the principle of lineal inertia, which Galilee deduced of his studies of cannonballs. There is hardly any lineal inertia in the universe. All are cycles. But Weapons want to go in straight lines... Only evolutionary theory, a verbal theory makes any sense. But it is expressed with words, not with the sacred digital language of the scientific method and the machine. So evolutionists are ignored, banned from the Nobel Prize... and social sciences receive no money from our educational systems, that pour their resources in lethal research on computer science, robotics and high particle physics.
      Take the case of modern research in sub-particles.
      You probably are puzzled by the enormous number of subatomic particles created by abstract physicists. Don't worry. They are totally irrelevant to the Universe. For one thing, they are not real particles. What scientists do is to smash with bomb-like energies tiny real particles, then considering the pieces of that wreckage as particles, when they are just atomic debris. Who cares about a piece of a car wrecked in a brutal accident? Only abstract scientists would spend billions of dollars analyzing a piece of iron melted and smashed by an atomic bomb. Of course those particles are subatomic garbage and as such last very short in the Universe. Less than a second before the Universe cleans its garbage, as a dead body last very short till insects and bacteria eat him up. To study pieces of corpses is just a repulsive task not a science. Yet most Nobel prizes of Mr. Dynamite are going to those garbage collectors. Why? Because since high energy experiments smashed the atom and opened the era of the Atomic bomb, the military wants more smashing experiments to find out a possible cosmic bomb. Indeed, the purpose of these experiments are other: the study of high energy systems for military purposes. Since the atomic bomb the military is easily convinced to waste billions of dollars in those experiments and physicists feel very happy to spend them. Point.
      Knowledge unfortunately has little to do with computer and abstract, physical sciences, concerned basically with the construction of technological machines, but limited in that quest by the dogmas of the scientific method. The scientific method that considers truth only the evidence collected with sensorial machines and digital languages is structurally faulty. All languages provide a certain quantity of truth, and all senses including human senses are valid collecting information. Yet as a religion of machines, the scientific method only accepts machine senses and machine languages - mathematics. Those errors make the scientific method a religion of machines, not of knowledge. And explain why the scientific method rejects Evolutionary theory, organic and vital theories about the nature of the Universe, and the generalization of the principles of undetermination and relativity, to any act of measure, which is a relative form of knowledge, unlike the causal explanations of reality provided by evolutionary and organic models of reality.
      The real Universe is efficient and simple based in survival and the vital relationships between energy and information that already the Chinese Taoists explained in terms of yin-information and yang energy... 3000 years ago, without the need of Synchrotrons, robots and Atomic bombs. Tat real Universe has only 4 real particles which are the living particles of the Universe. of which we know only 4, the 'stable' living particles of the Universe, perfectly organized in two groups, that act either as information particles or energy particles:
      - The graviton-neutrino that carries the force of gravitation to the Atomic Nucleon (either as a proton or as a Neutron, two vital states of the same particle). They condense matter and energy, with a single implosive direction.
      - And the photon, that carries the electromagnetic force, to the electron. They carry both energy and information, with a dual attractive-repulsive direction.
      So we are in a Universe of two parameters, energy and information carried by two forces and two kind of particles, the graviton-Nucleon; and the electron-photon.
      We knew that a century ago. Yet physicists have spent billion of dollars ever since, to look for imaginary particles, in search of new weapons with the excuse of knowledge only to confuse people about the simple structure of the Vital Universe.
      While the most important sciences for mankind, history, bioeconomics, medicine, systematically lack money in our universities, and space in our curriculums. They do not reproduce weapons but rather prove the lethality of them...
      We could go on with the errors of abstract science for hours.
      The mad scientist indeed exist. A man isolated of all other human beings, in his military, industrial or university lab. A man who is no longer human because deformed by abstract numbers, he has problems to think with words, that create our social ethics, emotions, and sense of survival. A cross-being between machine and man, who worships the machine and despises man. The natural enemy of our species. In the 2000s we will see how he raises again as he did in Germany in the 20s, or in the Atomic race, now in the robotic race, to the summit of industrial power, to extinguish our species, and substitute us with his idols - the scientific method of sensorial machines and digital languages that make human senses and verbal languages obsolete.
      What he forgets is the 'parable' of "Blade Runner". When he has achieved his glorious moment, and his son has ended with the life of the common people, the Robot will turn to him and despise him also as much as the scientist despises us. But nobody will cry for that death as he falls back into the ninth circle of Hell. We'll be all gone.