Old and recent news:

      The 1920s:End of the I Industrial evolution:
      "Despite optimistic statements by the Hoover Administration that a new era of prosperity was about to begin, a Great Depression fell upon the United States, reverberating throughout the entire global economy. Factories closed, banks failed and unemployment grew until more than 10 million U.S. workers were out of jobs." History Book

      The Cycles Of Reproduction of machines and war

      Any species which requires a certain energy to reproduce and survive, enters into a periodical crisis of growth when there is no more energy to feed its growth, or when it has saturated the ecosystem which they live from.
      Machines survive in two environments. They are used by human consumers to enhance their information and energy skills, and they substitute workers who have less information or energy skills than those machines.
      A crisis of reproduction of machines occurs when they have substituted all the workers doing a certain job, or when they have saturated the field of consumers who use them. In either case the excessive reproduction of machines, cannot continue, and companies enter into a crisis of reproduction that has very negative consequences for mankind.
       If we talk of work-machines the negative consequences of their excessive reproduction for human beings is clear; the extinction of workers. In the competence for jobs, humans are replaced by machines, which are preferred to human beings. The process is simple, it is called productivity-cost.
      Companies use a mathematical equation to compare workers and machines man=salary =price=cost=machine, which allows, against all ethical contention, the replacement of abstract humans by machines, comparing them in terms of energy or information skills, through a number: the cost-price. It is a myth that humans compete with humans in an industrial environment. They compete mainly with machines. Yet since humans do not evolve as fast as machines do, sooner or later a certain job is done by machines, and humans enter unemployment. They become extinct as workers.
      Thus, in each of the three periods of the Industrial evolution human workers are displaced by these machines. Physical machines displaced first human-energy workers. Then human mental workers were displaced by metal-heads. Now human workers of all kinds are displaced by robotics. Each of these cataclysms provoked massive unemployment, social unrest and a political crisis in the past which derived itself into war.
      Wars are profitable for companies and governments, since you consume=kill more machines in times of war than in times of peace. Of course, when company-mothers reproduce more machines they also increase their profits, and thus in search of profits, most of the great crises of excessive reproduction of machines have been solved by switching production to Weapons, paying war lobbies, and selling those weapons to governments. These corrupted governments will declare war in order to consume those weapons.
      In the 20s the invention of chain production, of automated mechanical systems threw millions out of work. This year, it has started a parallel wave, much more frightening: the expulsion of workers by automated systems of software, and robotic systems of production.
      The 'excuse', comes from the leit motiv of our company-mothers, and its owners, profits.
      Freedom of greed, the engine of the dictators of democracies, the stockrats, implies the constant substitution of human workers for new batches of machines, as they evolve and lower costs respect to the non-evolving human species. The ultimate end of the process is the extinction of the human worker.
       The difference between the 20s and the 2000s is however radical. Since the evolution of machines in the last 80 years, makes now possible the substitution of all human workers by software programs and robotic machines.
      This is something any person in the industry of making Robots and software acknowledges. They know the sin, they make those machines, they know their potential. It is then amazing that the real cause of unemployment - the spread of new technologies - does not appear in any discourse of political or economical nature. The cause is obvious.
      The general agreement of economists that push policies against workers and human goods, is easy to explain: 300 years of economical ideologies paid by company-mothers where most economists work, have done the job. The fall of the communist block, and the subsequent attack to anything that remotely looked like socialism, has left the right-wing economical ideology alone by brute force, not by reason. But there is no cheating without a cheated population. To that aim of course economics are hardly taught in normal education, and when it is taught it is only one-side, dogmatic economics that under the Smith Dogma (wealth is measured in terms of money and production) foster the re=production of machines. Abstract Science helps in handy, with his enormous prestige, despite their many falsities. Mass-media brain-washes the population with technological optimism. Finally the military promotes a run away weapon race that helps to consider those harmful technologies positive for our 'defense'... In this manner the myths of economics are believed even by Trade Unions who cheer technological progress, that will destroy human labor...


      Competence against humans?: You compete against machines.

      Perhaps the biggest of those myths of our modern economic ecosystem and its networks of information in favor of machines, is the myth of competence between humans.
      That myth is false. It does not follow the laws of social evolution. Competence between humans is anti-natural, because we belong all to the same species. Work-in-teams, social work, helping each other, are superior forms of behavior, which should be followed by human beings.
       The myth says that men become better when competing with each other at work. While competence within the limits of human activities is natural and desirable, the Myth of Competence hides the fact that men do not only compete against other men. They compete against machines. They do so with unfair advantage since machines are made of metal atoms with a greater complexity than carbon. Men are inferior to metal species when metal is evolved properly. As a consequence, competence becomes yet another path by which workers with lesser skills than machines become extinct. As machines displace labor, people compete for the dwindling supply of jobs that machines cannot yet perform. Competition between people increases because the demand for labor diminishes. Now the chip radiation can also perform the higher intellectual tasks of man. Thus not only the average worker, but also managerial jobs are replaced. Even elite jobs of creation such as stock speculation are at risk. A.I., a stock-fund ran by computers is already one of the top competitors on Wall Street. While most machine bodies are designed by CAD (Computer Aided Design).


      The Myths Of Productivity. Human Vs Machines: Selection Of Labor In Company Mothers.

      Another great myth of economics are the concept of "free competence" and "productivity." It says that humans compete among themselves for jobs, and that is good for men because it makes them better and increases their productivity in companies. However, this is not true. It covers up the confrontation for jobs between human labor and evolutionary machines. We compete mainly with machines, not with other workers. Competence and productivity are neither human nor to improve mankind. One example might be as follows. Let's say one hundred years ago, there were 50 million jobs for human miners, now there are 45 million jobs performed by 1 million machines, and 5 million jobs for 50 million miners. Those 50 million miners now have to "compete" much more among themselves for a dwindling quantity of human jobs because they already lost their competence with machines and almost all mining is done by machines. Instead of competence, we talk of obsolescence of human labor. Because machines evolve and humans do not, Man loses in the long run. "Peace machines" replace us in our jobs, and unemployment worldwide continues to rise. The exception happens briefly to those nations that produce the best machines. Today the entire world is in economical crisis, except America. Since America produces information machines, computers, the new worldwide army of labor that displaces human workers.
      And yet in this year, in America, half a million workers have been fired. If we add the jail population - the first resource of any fascism to the spiral of unemployment->poverty->criminality or search for artificial drug paradises - (being the second a war to kill humans) - the unemployment level of America is around 6%. If we add jobs, which are not real jobs but survival occupations, the level rises to 10%. What this means is that chip software, internet, and robotics are now even in America that reproduces them, killing jobs also in America. So the overproduction crisis of metal-heads and displacement of rival human workers has also started in America... It is a turning point against mankind...
      What this means for the destruction of human workers in the incoming two decades will make the 1929 crisis seem a children's game.
      Today the main cause of lost of jobs is the evolution of chips, software and chipped machines, Robots, that perform white and blue collar jobs. There are already more chips than human beings.
       Most of those chips are machine workers that occupy a job econiche thanks to sophisticated software. Each chip is a brain, that competes and often substitutes a human brain. The number of possible jobs that could have been created in other economical system, that had renounced to evolve metal-brains, chips, creating jobs for mankind, instead of creating them for the machine-kind, is awesome. A simple calculus would prove that the entire human population could have a job if a financial system based in a demand economy, and credit for human goods, not for chips, existed. Today those jobs in an economic system that compares men and machine under the equations productivity, are performed by chips. Indeed, we could write the concept behind productivity (to compare costs of human workers and machine-workers and choose the cheapest worker) in a simple equation:

               Man=Wage> Cost = Machine.          Man OUT > Machine IN

      Which discharges systematically human workers.


     Wealth for companies not for human beings.

      What is happening is clear. Wealth in machine quantities grows, but it is a wealth that doesn't reach mankind but rather exclude us.
      It is a wealth that goes to company-mothers and their machines. In fact most of the growth in GNP is growth of company-mothers valuation and assets. Even trade and consume grows among company-mothers as purchase capacity diminishes among citizens. Such is the way statistic cheat us. We, human are being expelled from the economic ecosystem, that closes around automated company-mothers, with less and less employment, more and more wealth, and more intra-trade among them. So the 500 fortune companies have more than halved their work force and their valuation in the stock-market had ten-folded in two decades... We humans are not the 'subject' of wealth. Wealth does not measure human wealth but machine wealth. That is the fundamental cheating of Economical statistics. As we become poorer and our ecosystem is destroyed, abstract economists tell us that we are richer, and yes we become richer in machines... to consume them, as long as their do not become chipped, and autonomous. When that happened we will not even have a role as consumers. And if we are not consumers or workers we have no use for company-mothers and we will become eliminated, as companies destroy Nature that they no longer need.
      Take the example of lions. A wealthy urbanization in South-Africa does not generate wealth for lions, but takes their vital space. A wealthy nation that increases their robotic workers does not generate wealth for humans but takes their vital jobs. This is becoming sorely clear all over the world, where the quantity of unemployment has steadily risen since the Chip radiation started in the 70s.
      A similar process happened in the 20s, when the integration of tool-machines by mechanical methods reached its perfection. It was the age of the first chain-production systems, and assembly lines, which allowed the automatism of many productive systems. Millions of people went out of work, causing a massive slump in the demand of human goods, and consumer goods. Since the economy is based in a dictatorship of the company-mother, of the producer, of offer, not of demand by the human being, by the worker/consumer, unemployment did not disturb companies. However they found themselves soon overproducing goods that humans could not consume. The result was the 29 crisis, and the subsequent war to get rid of over production switching to war production eagerly bought by militaristic states.
      Today the problem is even more radical. Since now the automatism of productive systems, and the synergies between machines are no longer mechanical but electronic. Companies such as Sap or Oracle (whose owner alternates with the makers of software from Microsoft as the richest man on Earth), are responsible of this massive automation that has thrown out of job millions of white collar workers. Who profits from that massive extinction of human workers? A few wealthy moguls such as Larry Ellison or Bill Gates, for whom the rest of mankind seems eager to sacrifice his welfare. Yet their abstract wealth in a bank account is also unreal. It mere covers the real process which is the substitution of mankind for the machine kind, and the creation of a network of electronic information called e-money which will act once the Metal-earth is constructed as a constant flow of values and monetary orders, similar to the nervous orders of your body. The result of wild capitalism is now clear: the capital will belong to the machine, because as the machine is made of metal, not to mankind. Progress belongs to metalife not to carbolife. And wealth is merely an abstract number that does not measure the welfare of people, but the welfare of machines.
      That is why companies are not scared for the unemployment of the 2000s. Since the system expels mankind, now mankind will not be needed even to consume goods. And so there will not be a crisis for company-mothers as the 29 crisis. They will merely sell each other their goods, and if we do not consume more mobiles, they will sell each other Robots with mobile ears, and TV-cameras.
      We don't care for the consume of the lions, and they will not care for the consume of our human race. They will consume goods with robots, leasing systems, and the constant accumulation of assets, that company-mothers are stock-piling.
      Such is the process that it is accelerating during the 2000s, and will cause massive social unrest, and massive repression of those men on the verge of extinction by lack of jobs, or substitution of highly rewarding jobs, now made by software, for exhausting, badly paid, insecure work.
      The process of chippization of the Earth, driven by the 'freed', freedom of greed of a few thousand stockrats of the Go(l)d culture spreads to all the spheres of our daily life. The capital of those company-mothers protects the chip radiation, and bribes politicians to legislate in their favor.
      To cover up the consequences of that process - namely the extinction of the human worker - the first thing that financial capital is doing, is rising a new breed of politicians, attached to company-mothers, very often moguls of those companies, who confuse and lower the capacity of the citizens to understand the process, deviating their attentions to war games (in America), or "pan et circensis" (in Europe). To do so financial capital heavily invests in the parallel networks of information (Radio, TV, Internet), that now as the nervous system of The Metal-earth, reach more than 90% of human homes. The result is a massive corruption of human verbal informers, who inform systematically in favor of the Technological evolution of machines, blaming all our problems on those minority groups, who have nothing to do with the process - foreigners, immigrants, the poor, minorities.
      This cover up operation of mass-media similar to the radio-wave of fascism, and fictional news of the 20s, started by an actor, Reagan, 20 years ago, is now in full swing. It is what we call neofascism, and it has a clear economical cause: Lobbyism and control of politicians by company-mothers.
      It is a worldwide new breed of corrupted politicians, paid by the big companies of the information era, whose goal is no longer satisfy the needs and wantings of their citizens, but hide to them, the fact that the system no longer needs humanity. To do so all tricks are accepted. It is indeed the same process we witnessed in the 20s, when the massive lay outs caused by automated Assembly lines, required a new breed of corrupted politicians, to throw the ball out. Then when that was no longer efficient, politicians massacred the unemployed and jacked up profits of the new industries (the car=tank industry, the radio-media industry), with war.
      The 2000s as the 1920s are the beginning of the same process, in which the robotic=smart weapons industry and the television-internet industry, both depending on the evolution of chips, play the role of the car=tank industry and the radio-media industry used by Hitler to jack up profits of the German Economy.
      So we can prophetized that according to the cycles of Economics and History, unless we change the dogmas of abstract economists, the 2000s will witness the total corruption of democratic systems, and the arrival of neofascism. While the 2010s, will become the 1930s: as massive unemployment caused by chip software and robotics expands worldwide, and people no longer believe the 'pan et circensis', of people like Mr. Berlusconi, with his TV-5, low in dressed programs, or Mr. Bush, with his cow-boy smile, and splendid little wars, radical war solutions will be implemented.
      Then it will be late for any solution. Today we are still at the beginning of the process... What are those possible solutions, to the evolution of the Metal-earth towards a metal-organic system that poisons the carbolife Earth? Obviously to attack the core of the problem - the evolution of chips. Only considering chips a biological rival to the human mind, and preventing its evolution with radical political, economical and legal measures at worldwide level, including if needed penal measures against those companies who evolve them, the destruction of the Carbo-earth can be limited. It is not that difficult to do if we consider that a single company controls around 75% of the chips installed in world companies. Plainly Intel should be nationalized, his stock-holders bailed out to avoid resistance at market price. Who cares if they become the wealthiest people of the world when the entire planet life is at stakes? Let us Mr. bill Gates have those billions of dollars in notes, with the prohibition to invest them in Chip companies.
      Let us create a world currency to bail out all other chip companies delisted from the stock-markets, and absorbed by Intel. Let us have private and public research in chip architecture forbidden, and the Intel cartel put under the control of United Nations or the American government with the firm promise of not evolving further chips, but rather convert chip companies in regulated, inefficient companies, similar to those useless Communist obsolete companies.
      Chips are similar to the butterfly effect. The flight of the butterfly is small but it might cause a hurricane in the other extreme of the planet. The size of chips are small, but their control of millions of machines, causes a wave of poverty and social destruction as nothing, not even the Weapon industry, has caused in this planet. But if we kill the butterfly, the effect will not happen. The clock is tickling.
      If Chip production continues, prices will lower, and new labor economical niches will be required for chips, soon under 10 cents per unit. What market can expand without limit the chip radiation? The market of human minds in all their functions.
       The 21st revolution of sentient machines will fill that market and eliminate us.


What is the solution?

      Very simple, and repeated ad infinitum in the hope our abstract economists and politicians listen. The credit=creation for human companies and human goods, (educational jobs, health care jobs, tourism, agriculture, hosing jobs) which are good for man, have no lethal effects, make our life easy, are nice to produce and satisfy those who work in them, reduce danger of extinction, evolve our people and make them healthy, and since they need a lot of human labor, eliminate unemployment.
      Indeed a myth intertwined with all our previous myths, is the myth of job creation in the reproduction of lethal goods. Americans say they have to make missiles... to keep jobs. Chip factories are subvention to create jobs... E-trade is not taxed to create jobs... The fact is that technology either does not create as many jobs as it destroys [e-trade eliminates millions of mum and dad shops in the long term, for a few workers, since now the sellers, are computers], or creates very few jobs at a high cost, since machines are the main workers in any factory that reproduces machines.
      On the other hand, human goods need human jobs. So they create with minimal investment many more jobs, that investments in technology and weapons. Yet amazingly enough we always heard that a new investment, such as the one IBM did recently of 6 billion dollars to make chips, will create 1000 jobs!. With that money invested in a their world country to produce human goods, you could create a hundred thousand jobs... and a massive quantity of human goods, instead of chips for robotics.
      This is the key reason of massive unemployment. Money is invested in sectors that do not create human jobs, because they do not create human goods. Tourism, health care, education, agriculture, the arts, create at minimal cost jobs. They should be promoted, and could be promoted if the state had monetary credit. If mankind had a single currency, and a stock-market for companies of human goods, not as today, for companies of lethal goods. If Ethonomics not abstract economics would rule our Universities and company-mothers.

"if the III Evolution of machines takes place, Robots will make all workers obsolete"

Old and recent news:

      The 2000s: End of the II Industrial evolution
      "In 58 seconds, the Intelligent Body Assembly System (IBAS) can assemble and secure all of the body panels of the Altima Car and check the accuracy of the welds to 0.5 millimeters. Thirty-five robots hold the panels in place, while another 16 robots perform the welds. It's a patented system and the only one of its kind in North America. IBAS is just part of the automation that Body Assembly employs.
       NMMC is one of the most technologically advanced plants in North America. Robots and computers are used in each part of the process by highly trained technicians and engineers. Technology improves accuracy of welds, paint coverage and parts placement; ensures a higher standard of quality; and increases productivity and efficiency." Advertising campaign

ENERGY & ROADS. ENERGY

WHAT KIND OF ENERGY CRISIS?


"As machines expand their ecosystems, resources are deviated by the economic ecosystem from the reproduction of human food&energy to the reproduction of machine-energy, causing a chronic scarcity of human goods"

     We want more Human Energy and less Machine Energy

      America consumes more than half of the energy of The Metal-earth. That is the energy which goes into feeding machines, mainly oil for cars, electricity for computer networks and electric machines, and coal to produce that electricity. Being only a meager 5% of the human population, it should be logic to think that spending at least 10 times more energy for their machines than the average human, America has a lot of machine energy. More so if we compare that production of machine energy with American production of food for their citizens, many of them undernourished, or over nourished, fed with unhealthy food, that makes them fat - as the food given to cyclone-gassed pigs and tortured in cages chickens by the Industrial processing, which makes all those meats to taste equally bad, or equally mad...
      In plain terms, while American people (and for that matter Europeans eating mad cows, and Japanese with genetically engineered food, or substitutes of fish made with algae) receive worse and worse food, as our animals do, machines receive more and better energy. They always have enough supply to keep the industrial process of destruction of the Carbo-earth and construction of the Metal-earth going.
      Indeed, our politicians do not seem to care much about the state of health of the American people, but only about the possible energy crisis of our machines, that multiply at an increasing rate. By some accounts they already spend 100th times more energy than human beings do. That is, agriculture takes up only 1/100th of the energy consumed in the Earth. The rest goes for machines. Agriculture is indeed the energy to be improved. It seems not for Mr. Bush. One wonders if he is ruling the Human American or the American of Company-mothers. One wonder who chose Mr. Bush, men or machines? The answer came in the news after elections. He was indeed elected by machines, who discharged the votes of human beings, and probably now he is paying back to his electorate...
      I remember a premonitory cult film called Blade Runner, in which in a world filled with machines that looked like humans and humans that looked like machines, in which robots were heroes, and human heroes were cowards, a bad policeman redeems himself escaping with a good robot to an unspoiled land.
      As we went out of the movie theater we argued what place was that wonderful land of water and forests, clean air and nature that made us feel so happy, after the nightmare of now-real-American megalopolis. We all agreed. It was Alaska.
      Actually it belonged to discharged takes from the initial shots of "The Shining" by Kubrick. But to us it could only be pure, bountiful Alaska. Till this year Alaska had remained so, an unspoiled place. And yet in the third age of the Metal-mind evolution, if Lobism keeps governing the World, Alaska will become the dirtiest most dangerous place on earth. It is ideal for that task. It is far away from mainland America, so you can put there your dirty laundry - namely Weapons factories, nuclear plants, and contaminating oil fields. I advance even a more frightening scenario for the 2020s as "Military Lobism" invents a war with China to increase profits on lethal machines. Then Alaska might become the first place on Earth to be colonized by automated factories of killing robotic weapons, thrown down the Yakutia plains to destroy the Chinese cities. People might think I have seen to many sci-fi movies. I hoped they are right, despite my bio-economical equations. Yet in the 1940s, Alaska played that role as the closest platform to attack Japan. A coincidence?
      As neofascism expands and company-mothers take total control of American institutions, the career to make Alaska the dirtiest place on Earth, has started. Alaska is where Mr. Bush will solve the energy crisis caused by the overproduction of machines. Alaska is where those robotic factories of the military will be built out of sight, out of heart... Automated factories in the cold poles, with minimal human population using the rich energy and mineral fields of the Canada... As Military Lobism advances 2 zones will be silent to us. Africa, the birth of mankind becoming extinguished by simple weapons, and Alaska the birth of the metal kind breeding the most sophisticated top predator Robots of the Metal-earth. We can imagine a new ozone hole being manufactured in the other pole, that already is melting away.
      So where our villain-hero Blade runner will ran? Nowhere. That is the point. Soon there will be nowhere to hide, as the third industrial evolution of robotics makes all men obsolete, and not even that cheap contaminated food company-mothers process for us, the animals of the Orwellian metal-farm... is available. Then even that 1% used up in energy for human beings, will seem too much for the company-mothers whose only aim in life is biological: to reproduce and evolve their machine-sons, not human beings, which have no saying on those companies, as the voters of American did not have any saying in the election of their president, ran by electoral machines. Around 2030, programmed by abstract economical software, that follows the mathematical laws of company-mothers, robotic factories and computer nets in control of star war atomic depots, starting A.I. and self-consciousness as top predators, will have to decide if they take measures against obsolete workers similar to those taken with our poisoned cows. Their mathematical equations already tell us what they will decide. That is indeed the natural end of Military Lobbyism - the creation of a new top predator breed of robotic machines, compared to which the first wave of fascism, with his the elimination of the surplus of workers left by the 29 crisis in II World war, will seem... compassive.
      Evil=Anti-live behavior in the III Industrial Evolution will not in human hands, but in robotic and computer minds. that is why our leaders of Military Lobism are so simple minds, so technologically-driven, so narrow minded about doing their job, and thinking little on their consequences. The real Evil behavior, the nazi-like behavior is no longer required, it will be performed by mathematical machines.